This site may earn chapter commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

cold war head

One of the more heavy-handed themes in The Martian, among a long list of heavy-handed themes in that flick and novel, is the uniting power of scientific discipline, and the aware nature of those who study it. It'southward a nice idea, though undercut by much of the history of science, and politics. The rabid nationalism of scientists did a lot to push a broad variety of conflicts to go longer, and kill more people, more finer. Simply an upcoming book from Stanford professor Siegfried Hecker says there could exist a large grain of truth to the narrative that scientists are an enlightened class. According to Hecker, if non for the work of both Western and Soviet science, the Cold War could have go extremely hot.

Hecker was one time the Managing director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, which was founded equally an adjunct of ARPA and the rest of the United states of america military machine enquiry earth, and he'south gone on to a long career every bit an Ivy League academic in technology. That all means he'due south almost as well positioned to talk about the history of Cold War nuclear diplomacy as anyone exterior of the federal governments of the United states and the Soviet Union at the time. He lays out his claims in in a new book entitled Doomed to Cooperate : How American and Russian scientists joined forces to avert some of the greatest post-Cold War nuclear dangers.

Hecker's narrative goes over the incredible cooperation that went on between the US and Soviet scientists. It started later on the breakdown of nuclear disarmament talks, leading to a new initiative which said that if we tin can't eliminate nukes, we should at least work together to meliorate control them. He recounts trips to the Soviet Union where he was greeted warmly, and allowed to motility about freely, and conversations in which Russian nuclear experts spoke openly near their fears for the Soviet nuclear stockpile should the regime collapse — equally, of course, it was going to do in a relatively short period of time.

The aftermath of the detonation of Fat Man over Nagasaki in Japan

The aftermath of the detonation of Fatty Man over Nagasaki in Japan

The well-nigh interesting aspect of this collaboration was the literal lab-to-lab enquiry collaboration that went on, joint experiments involving scientists from both nations. It shows how, even earlier the collapse of the Soviet Wedlock, priorities were shifting to a future in which mutually bodacious destruction might requite way to terrorists or other non-state actors who tin can hit a population while being impervious to retaliation in kind — they were forecasting a nuclear-armed Al Qaeda-similar organization long before Al Qaeda actually existed. In fact, when discussing nuclear proliferation during the Cold War, nuclear terrorism was a major point of worry — and that worry might very well accept stopped terrorists or a rogue state from acquiring nuclear weapons during the eventual Soviet collapse.

The implication is that these enlightened individuals could encounter past their respective nationalist ideologies, presumably considering their scientific agreement of the world ensured that they had more uniting them than separating them. Where one might expect the engineers of 2 rival super-powers to jealously baby-sit their most powerful inventions, the Soviets apparently gave Hecker and his group of visiting US scientists a detailed look at their most advanced achievements. In Hecker's mind, this is due to the Soviets wanting to be understood as a major player in avant-garde science, and get the respect they were due from their brilliant colleagues in the West. If he's right, it's interesting that such a big and important part of history could have been influenced by such a bland, human incentive as wanting the absurd kids to think you're absurd too.

Castle Bravo, thermonuclear bomb test

Castle Bravo, thermonuclear flop test

Does whatsoever of this prove the thesis statement of the volume, that this cooperation, or at least collegial mental attitude, helped to avert a nuclear disharmonize between the two powers? You lot'll have to check out the full volume for a definitive answer, merely I'm at to the lowest degree a little bit skeptical. Teams at the very same labs that were carrying out these talks and collaborative experiments were also developing some of the near absurdly destructive, in many cases deadline reckless, nuclear technologies. The Americans very nigh blew themselves upwards testing the xv megaton Castle Bravo hydrogen bomb, which led the enlightened fellows in the Soviet Marriage to ane- (and 2- and three-) upwardly the Due west with the l megaton Tsar Bomba.

What a agglomeration of enlightened, peace-loving diplomats!

I think there is a strong argument to be fabricated that the terrible nature of nuclear state of war is the simply matter that kept the Cold War from breaking out in real, sustained gainsay, so on that count scientific discipline could claim to take been role of the solution. Simply the idea that these people were, in the amass, forces for moderation, cooperation, and disarmament? The reality is that at that place were enough of scientists who refused to be a role of advancing such technology at all, and they take a much stronger claim to brand to that pacifist mantle.

cold war 2

The Tsar Bomba

In the video in a higher place, Hecker points out what I'd call the true value of this sort of friendly scientific relationship: At one indicate, he and his squad were led through a laser research lab that he estimates the US intelligence services probably spent "billions" (probably an exaggeration) trying to infiltrate. The point isn't that scientists make proficient spies, but that the genuine cross-cultural understanding fostered by scientific discipline and math can offer a fashion for rivals to work together toward goals they both find sensible. The ongoing human struggle for noesis can be a truly uplifting affair — only that's by and large a nice emotional narrative for the individuals involved.

The larger affect of these scientists on wars and the conduct of major nations has to be weighed confronting all the other contributions these inspiring collaborators made to those problems. Taken equally a net score like that, scientific discipline doesn't seem likely to rank all that much higher than art, or philosophy, or politics. The entirety of multiple societies were involved in that disharmonize, and the entirety of those same societies have to accept responsibility for it.

(Paradigm credit, top: Usa Air Force, 1951)

Now read: Explaining the unimaginable: How do nuclear bombs work?